Which factor is NOT a typical review management best practice?

Prepare for the APMP Bid/Proposal Foundation Certification Exam with our comprehensive materials. Use targeted flashcards and multiple-choice questions to enhance understanding. Get ready to excel in your certification journey!

Effective review management relies on giving reviewers enough time, leveraging people who truly understand the subject matter, and capturing and acting on feedback. When you allocate insufficient time for reviews, the process becomes rushed, critical issues can be missed, and the overall quality of the proposal suffers. That makes it not a best practice.

Involving subject-matter experts in the review process is a standard best practice because they can assess technical accuracy, feasibility, and compliance more reliably. Tracking reviewer feedback is also a common best practice, ensuring that each comment is logged, addressed, and the final proposal improves accordingly. The idea that reviews should be performed by individuals with no subject-matter knowledge runs counter to these aims, since lack of expertise tends to produce less useful, more superficial critiques.